The population of the planet has essentially tripled in the past 100 years or so. This has put large pressure on the resources of the planet and the ability for the world to feed its population. Some countries e.g. India have done little to curtail the explosion in population. In some cases there is an active effort to out breed the inhabitants of a country with the aim to take majority and through the democratic process take power to then remove democracy.
Sensible nations and sensible people will match the population with the available resources. In Australia, with water figures and arable land area this figure in Australia is probably around the 25 million mark as an upper limit.
The government and the business community wants to see figures like 30 million in the near future so they are importing people as fast as they can.
The issue here is that the places where these people are coming from typically suffer from over population and a culture of having large numbers of babies. So we are bringing people in from a failed environment, people that have no understanding of, or use, population as a measure of control.
Some of these groups, e.g. followers of Islam, have no respect for our freedoms, our religious or our culture and want to replace it with their own. To that end they bring in more family members and start increasing their community sizes.
The results can clearly be seen in places like the UK and Europe. Through study people like Dr. Peter Hammond have categorised the progress of this process.
If the population of Muslims stays around 1% or lower then they remain peaceful, non-threatening and are portrayed as an interesting minority group. Australia currently enjoys this position.
At 2-3% they start to proselytize from other minorities, jails and street gangs. The UK is in this position now.
After 5% they start to push for halal food and so secure this industry for Muslims. They also start pushing for Sharia law for their own communities. France and Sweden are in this position.
At 10% they will start breaking laws to complain. This is also when the threats start. Paris, Amsterdam showed this kind of behaviour.
By 20% the rioting starts, the jihad militia starts up, church burning and so on. Ethiopia is an example of this.
At 40% the widespread massacres start, and serious terror attacks begin. Bosnia is a good example. By 60% the free persecution of non-believers kicks in, ethnic cleansing, genocide etc. Malaysia and Albania fall into this category. By 80% , well you can see the pattern. Egypt, Gaza, Indonesia.
At 100% all is "peace" because everyone is Muslim. Somalia and Afghanistan are examples of how this does not work. By then they are typically actively killing each other.
What is true is that at whatever stage a Muslim population wields more influence (and problems) than their percentage should indicate.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are welcome, ad-hominem attacks are not. Supporting references are encouraged. Comments are not endorsed by the author of this blog as representing his point of view.